Prince Andrew's lawyers have asked his accuser Virginia Roberts to 'hand over the original photograph of them together at Ghislaine Maxwell's home' amid claims it is not authentic

• e-mail

Prince Andrew's lawyers have asked his accuser Virginia Roberts to produce the original version of the notorious photograph showing the pair together at Ghislaine Maxwell's London home, amid claims that it is a fake.

A US lawyer working for the Duke of York has arranged for a photographic expert to study the original if they can access it, according to the I newspaper.

Andrew Brettler, an attorney working for the Queen's son on the case, hopes the expert will cast doubt on the photograph's authenticity.

Ms Roberts - who now goes by her married name of Giuffre - spoke of the photo's whereabouts in 2016, saying then that it could be in moving boxes at her in-laws' home in Sydney, Australia, full of 'nerf guns, kids' toys, photos,' she has said.

She claims the picture - that shows a smiling 41-year-old Prince Andrew with his arm around her waist when she was 17, and Maxwell standing behind the pair in a doorway - was taken the same night the Duke allegedly sexually assaulted her the first time.

Prince Andrew and his legal team are contesting a civil case in New York launched by Ms Giuffre last August, in which she alleges Andrew assaulted her three times.

He has vehemently denied the allegations since they were first made public.

Prince Andrew's lawyers have reportedly asked his accuser Virginia Roberts to give them the original version of the infamous photograph (pictured) allegedly showing the pair together at Ghislaine Maxwell's London home, amid claims that it is a fake 

The Duke of York's legal team has tried repeatedly to get the case thrown out before it reaches a courtroom, but have so far failed.

In the meantime, Andrew's position within the British royal family has deteriorated. He stepped down from royal duties in 2019, and returned his patronages and military titles earlier this year as the case reaching court became more likely.

The image, first released to the media in 2011, has gone on to become synonymous with the Duke, the accusations, his ongoing legal battle and questions over his relationship with the late billionaire paedophile Jefferey Epstein.

Ms Roberts claims she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell. The latter is facing up to 40 years in prison after she was convicted of a string of sex offences in New York, although she has filed a request for a retrial.

The photo was reportedly taken in March 2001 at Maxwell's London apartment, and has been reproduced countless times around the world after Ms Roberts - known now as Ms Giuffre after her marriage - shared it with The Mail on Sunday.

Gaining access to the image has been an ambition of Andrew's lawyers ever since, but they are yet to provide any evidence themselves that it is not genuine.

Pictured: Prince Andrew is seen driving through Windsor, England with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson earlier this month

Pictured: Virginia Roberts Giuffre speaks during a press conference outside a Manhattan court in New York, Aug. 27, 2019

However, earlier this month interest in the theory was renewed when Lady Victoria Hervey - a British socialite and ex-girlfriend of Prince Andrew's - sensationally repeated claims that the infamous photo was indeed faked.

The 44-year-old socialite and former 'It Girl', who is the daughter of the 6th Marquess of Bristol, doubled down on a claim she made earlier by identifying the set of images she says were used to create the doctored photo.

Harvey claimed the image has been pieced together using a photo taken at Naomi Campbell's birthday party on board a yacht in St Tropez in May 2001, in which Virginia can be seen wearing the same white tank top with colourful patterned jeans.

What's more - like Andrew's lawyers - Harvey does not have a copy of the exact photo from St Tropez which she claims was used to fake the Prince Andrew image, and it has never been seen publicly. However, she did share a bizarre painted reproduction of the alleged image to Instagram earlier this week.

Lady Victoria added to her baffling claims by saying that an 'Irish guy' who was dating one of Epstein's victims in 2001 and also attended the boat party was used as a 'body double' for Prince Andrew in the 'fake' image.

In an exclusive interview, Lady Victoria told FEMAIL she has spoken to several victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who said they believe the image was edited by Virginia and Maria Farmer, another victim who worked as an 'artist-in-residence' for Epstein. 

Andrew's lawyers will hope that by getting their hands on the original, the photograph expert will be able to say conclusively if it is real or not.

There are various tell-tale signs to establish a photo's authenticity.

According to the American Scientist: 'If lines connecting corresponding points in a scene and its reflection do not converge on a common intersection in the image plane, the image may be a fake.'

A simpler way would be to find whether the photograph has a Certificate of Authenticity (COA), which sometimes will be printed with a photograph.

Ms Giuffre has previously said that she is not certain where the original copy of the photograph is. When she was deposed by lawyers for Maxwell, she said it was 'not in my possession right now,' according to the New Zealand Herald.

She said she suspects the photo is 'probably in some storage boxes' at her in-laws' home in Sydney, Australia, that were left there when she and her husband moved.

'I mean, there's seven boxes full of Nerf guns, my kids' toys, photos. I don't know what other documents would be in there,' she said at the time.

She also said that she had previously handed the photo over to the FBI who conducted an investigation into Maxwell and Epstein.

When contacted by, DailyMail.com the FBI declined to comment on whether it had seen the photograph, or on whether there was an active investigation on-going into Prince Andrew.

However, in January, the Daily Beast cited a 'source in Virginia Giuffre's camp' saying that 'they did not know whether Giuffre still has the original of the photo, or whether the original photograph even still existed.'

In November 2019, Andrew was asked about the photograph in a disastrous interview on BBC's Newsnight program.  

Asked whether the photograph could have been faked, he said public displays of affection are 'not something he would do' but refused to reveal whether he thought the image was doctored.

He said: 'Oh it's definitely me, I mean that's a picture of me. I don't believe it's a picture of me in London because when I go out in London I wear a suit and a tie.

'That's what I would describe as my travelling clothes if I'm going to go overseas. There's plenty of photographs of me dressed in that sort of kit but not there.'     

Lady Victoria claimed the image of Virginia was taken at the birthday boat party. The image has never been seen publicly but another of Epstein's victims has allegedly painted  an image of what the original photograph would have looked like (pictured)  

The 44-year-old socialite and former 'It Girl', who is the daughter of the 6th Marquess of Bristol, repeated claims made by the Duke in his disastrous Newsnight interview that the image may have been doctored

News of Andrew's legal bid comes as his youngest daughter Princess Eugenie made a trip to Los Angeles to see her cousin Prince Harry, where the pair watched the Super Bowl together on Sunday night  (pictured)

Prince Andrew spoke about his links to Jeffrey Epstein in an interview with BBC Newsnight's Emily Maitlis in November 2019

The Prince called it a 'photograph of a photograph of a photograph', casting doubt over its veracity.   

Sources close to Andrew have previously said there are questions over the veracity of the photo, amid claims the hand round his accuser's waist does 'not look right.'

In the interview, the Duke of York said: 'I'm terribly sorry but if I, as a member of the royal family, and I have a photograph taken and I take very, very few photographs, I am not one to, as it were, hug and public displays of affection are not something that I do.

'So that's the best explanation I can give you and I'm afraid to say that I don't believe that photograph was taken in the way that has been suggested.'

He added that the photograph appeared as though it had been taken upstairs in Ghislaine Maxwell's house, and said that was somewhere he never went - in another questioning remark about the image.

'Listen, I don't remember, I don't remember that photograph ever being taken,' he said. 'I don't remember going upstairs in the house because that photograph was taken upstairs.'

And referring to his hand in the photograph, he said: 'From the investigations that we've done, you can't prove whether or not that photograph is faked or not because it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph.

'So it's very difficult to be able to prove it but I don't remember that photograph ever being taken.'  

The version of the image that has been reproduced multiple times and shared the world over - a photograph of the photograph - was taken in 2011 by a New Zealand-based photograph, Michael Thomas.

Speaking to New Zealand Herald this week, Mr Thomas said he has no doubts over its authenticity.

'I have always believed it was real,' Mr Tomas said. 'As I have said before it was just an ordinary photo you would have got from a chemist in the days of negatives. Surely if it was fake every media outlet in the world would be getting sued for using it. The fact that isn't happening, to me says everything.'

Speaking in 2019 about the picture, he said: 'It wasn't like she pulled the photo of Prince Andrew out, it was just in among the rest of them. They were just typical teenage snaps. There's no way that photo is fake.' 

News of Andrew's legal bid comes as his youngest daughter Princess Eugenie made a trip to Los Angeles to see her cousin Prince Harry, where the pair watched the Super Bowl together on Sunday night.