This is not just scientific madness, it appears to be very intentional and purposeful.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.
Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose:
(Via NPR) […] “Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine.
“During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine,” he says, “and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that.”
He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study. “It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.
People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots. (read more)
Just so we are clear, the final FDA authorization and approval for the vaccines are based on the outcome of these trials. As noted in the example above, the control group was intentionally lost under the auspices of “the right thing to do”, so there is no way for the efficacy, effectiveness or safety of the vaccine itself to be measured.
There’s no one left within the control group, of a statistically valid value, to give an adequate comparison of outcomes for vaxxed -vs- non-vaxxed.
Whiskey – Tango – Foxtrot !!! This is nuts.
That NPR article is one to bookmark when people start claiming the vaccination is effective.
How can the vaccine not be considered effective when there is no group of non-vaccinated people to compare the results to?
Good grief, the entire healthcare system is operating on a massive hive mindset where science, and the scientific method, is thrown out the window in favor of ideological outcomes and self-fulfilling prophecies. The fact that the researchers and doctors, apparently under the payroll of the pharmaceutical companies that have a vested financial interest in the vaccine outcome, lost the control group on purpose is alarming.
Of course, Big Pharma will promote the vaccine as beneficial, and the controlled media will promote that message with a complete disconnect from the clinical trial details, and the FDA will grant approval on results that were intentionally constructed to produce only one outcome.
Madness…. All of it.
That is why they NEED to have the remaining “Control” group in the population eliminated….one way or the other.
There are plenty of reasons for mistrust, but this isn’t one of them. Dissolving the control group is an ‘ethical requirement’ when using human subjects. You cannot take human beings and say they cannot get the treatment that works.
Yes, it does hurt the ability to get long-term results, but the ‘trial subjects’ are people. If the trial shows what works, then doctors must act to protect them too.
Whether the trials were really done right is a different question, one I don’t have the information to answer.
Mistrust is an understatement. What about Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin? Pfizer is now trying to develop a pill that’s sounds an awful like Ivermectin. That’s because the vaccine is NOT working and we had the therapeutic drugs in our possession all along. But BIG Pharma, Fauci and CCP cohorts wouldn’t have made the billions of dollars that they did by lying to all of us. Not to mention the millions of people they killed in their greed. May God have mercy on their souls.
President Trump’s advisor on Covid, Dr. Scott Atlas, a fellow at Stanford was right, so we’re the Frontline Docotors, about HCQ & Ivermectin. The propagandists couldn’t have the truth out so they thrust Birx & Fraudci into the spotlight. I don’t trust this administration for anything. Covid is not a natural virus, it is patented. You cannot patent nature. This whole thing is diabolical.
“Covid is not a natural virus”.
No virus has ever been purified, grown in culture, and used to recreate symptoms in a healthy person.
Doctors tried to do this very hard with the so called Spanish Flu patients, and never could.
Ditto with AIDS patients, so even Luc Montagnier stated that the condition could be cured with diet and hygienic measures.
Virology as it exists, is a complete hoax.
What is killing people by clotting their blood is not a “spike protein”, which by definition cannot be on the surface of this “virus” if it doesn’t exist, but the graphene oxide which is now known to be the major component in all these “vaccines.”
Tim just because you can’t see it with your eyes does not prove nonexistence…. Viruses are hard to see without a powerful microscope because they are simple organisms and extremely small. All they really do is enter cells and replicate using the mechanisms and resources of the cell entered. They are not too different than that mRNA in the so called vaccines. What they are doing is like trying to cure Ebola Reston by injecting you with Ebola Zaire.
The former is almost benign for humans while the later is a slate wiper.
Actually a virus is not an organism.
It is i a separate group.
A virus enters a cell & uses the cell’s material to replicate itself, & in so doing, destroys the cell which was an organism.
interesting . I see the venom of the Graphene oxide but still not prepared to let the spike protein of the hook. there is more to know yet luciferase luciferin hydrogel in pcr test etc
Tim. Very interesting. But if correct then why did people die of clotting before the vaccine/graphene?
My theory is that people who have had a build up of graphene oxide from previous flu vaccines or things like chemtrails were most affected by covid before the vaccines.
The virus is not patented. The genetic sequence is… as is the genetic sequence of ANY newly-discovered significant bit of life.
YES that’s a crazy state of affairs. But it has nothing to do with this virus, and nothing to do with “patenting life.”
In reality, such patents should not be allowed. A rote process (genome sequencing) “discovers” the info. Right now, whoever does that first gets to patent it. Totally Crazy.
As with other similar things, eventually this will go to court and I expect the whole set of such patents will be tossed.
10000000% agree
Why didn’t Trump stand strong for HCQ? And why did he leave us with Fauxci? Why the vaccine push? Unforgivable. Suspicious.
God will not have mercy on their souls.
“The soul that sinneth, it shall die”, and these souls have sinned since the moment they began to breathe.
Scripture states that no liar will enter into the new Jerusalem, and these people are, without exception, knowing, calculating, and utterly corrupt liars.
Their names will be obliterated from the Book of Life, and they will be remembered no more.
Merck, the original makers and patent-holders of Ivermectin, are also working on an oral treatment. This after essentially discrediting Ivermectin’s potential effectiveness and partnering with J&J on their vaccine.
Go figure.
What is interesting is the Merck decided not to play the vaccine game and pulled the plug knowing that no vaccine would be as effective as natural immunity.
May God give them exactly what they deserve!!!
Guess who is head of ethics for the NIH……….. Fauci’s wife! Conclusion: NO ETHICS!
Amen!!!
MAY GOD NOT HAVE MERCY ON THEIR SOULS AND CONDEMN THEM TO BURN IN THE HOTTEST DEPTHS OF THE LAKE OF FIRE! THIS IS GENOCIDE ON A SCALE THE EARTH HAS NEVER SEEN BEFORE! THEY ARE TRYING TO KILL OUR CHILDREN! THERE WILL BE NOTHING BUT GODS WRATH ON THEIR SOULS!
it does not work as you claim. it is a failure.
You are WRONG! As your name states you are a DUNCE. I got Covid and 1 day after diagnosis I was prescribed Hydroxychloroquine along with Ivermectin. Symptoms gone and recovered in 3 days. The pharmacist had filled over 300,000 scripts of Hydroxychloroquine and had 0.0% deaths.
Dunce was actually replying to the comment from Gerard Michael Burns Jr.
I could make a rude comment about the misinterpretation but that wouldn’t be nice now would it?
Where do u live please
Sounds like a pretty damned good treatment next to what we are learning about the results of the clot shots.
Did you and your fellow patients use vitamin C and D3 also?
Sit down dude.
https://c19ivermectin.com/
Exactly. The members of the control group had to be told they were given placebo and only then requested the vaccine. They weren’t presenting worsening conditions whereby ethics say they need to be told. The drug makers saw them doing just fine and could not afford any frogs to go in boiled in trial phase.
They can and do give placebos in clinical trials all the time. My husband participated in one for a chemotherapy drug.
There’s nothing ethical about losing the control. The trial was never taken to conclusion and no long term safety or efficacy results can possibly be known. It’s absurd and unethical to even continue without a control group and insane to go on and even think about approval for anything without a long term study of safety.
Wrong wrong wrong wrong WRONG!!!!
This is a clinical trial to determine safety and efficacy. There is NO greater ethical requirement than that. You’re absolutely lying or you have absolutely no idea how trials are supposed to work.
I have been involved with clinical trial documentation for over 20 years now. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
While what you say is true about giving treatment when its the right thing to do, in this case, they had no idea as the power of the Ph 3 trial wasn’t powerful enough. 30K split into 2 for a virus with a 0.1% IFR is a joke. Further, their clinical endpoints were a joke…positive pcr w/ one symptom, like a cough. They had, and still have, no idea of its efficacy and they moved forward.
What you describe is in situations where there is immediate benefit and clear. They certainly didn’t have that. Finally, those long term safety studies take 2 years at a minimum. Halting this one was a cover up, not an ethical obligation by any means. One more thing, the same folks that did this laughed at Dr. Didier in France when he did the HCQ study during a pandemic and did the same thing. This is called a clue.
It doesn’t “hurt the ability to obtain long term results”, it obliterates it. Rendering the study truly useless. Nothing new though.
The safety and efficacy had not and has not been established therefore this was not a decision based on ethical principals. This is total unacceptable especially for an infection with such a low mortality rate. I have been doing clinical trials for over 40 years and the only time you would stop the trial and do something like this is when approval nor EUA is eminent. This not following GCP!!!!
Works and safe are totally different. Covid is statistically not dangerous so I think studying safe is far more helpful.
Explain that to the black people that were used as experiments in the Tuskegee syphilis trials for decades. And the researchers started out knowing that syphilis is fatal.
BS. There was no proper measureable data beyond an average of 56 days after the 2nd jab for either effectiveness or safety. The maximum number of days out was 97 days for EUA. When you have zero mid-term or long-term safety data, that is neither wise nor ethical. “First, do no harm.”
Autoimmune diseases typically take years to develop or at least until they are finally recognized and diagnosed. Same for cardiovascular, metabolic and neurological diseases. We are seeing many different forms of inflammatory immune response symptoms in patients post experimental gene therapy drug injections.
It also looks like many patients may have relatively unremarkable chemistry, PT, aPTT and CBC test results with clotting and myocardial injury symptoms. One is mucking around with a person’s immune system with an artificial, man-designed S1 spike protein. That’s why it was critical for clinical trials go out 2 years. Vaccines normally take 5-10 years for approvals.
We also lost the ability to determine how long the “vaccine” remains effective at preventing infection compared to the unvaxx’d control. We’re now seeing a push for 3rd boosters in Pfizer and Moderna drugs as “effectiveness” seems to wan by 6 months. One would likely see the gap of protection close earlier with a control group.
Finally from an ethical standpoint, there are many, many, many available and effective therapeutics that should have been deployed instead of attempting a global vaccine program. Cheap and even useful as prophylactics. Natural immunity always is more broad spectrum and powerful than a narrowly defined “target antigen” for a vaccine. That’s how immune systems work.
They signed up to be in the trial. They knew they could have a placebo and not the real thing. Yes, AFTER the trial is over, they should be told and given a choice to vax, but not until the trial is over. FDA EMERGENCY USE approval is not actual approval.
Gerard, how do you justify saying it was an ethical requirement when the human trial was based on only placebo and no vaccinated subjects. It was all a lie to get FDA to approve emergency use. Now everyone who was lied to about this being a proven treatment is subject to health issues and even death as so many have already found out.
No,no,no. The FDA did NOT say that the “vaccine” works, in fact it said that it is considered experimental, it has NOT been approved by any means. You obviously have had no experience with bringing an FDA approved drug to market.
Stop pushing false information, this is not how the process works at all.
Well stated. There are plenty of reasons for mistrust, but the argument presented here is not one of them.
Gerard,
I have to disagree.
This is a typical circular argument (generally put forth by those with an interest in seeing their drug “succeed” [sales wise vs. actual health] in the market, but I digress) masquerading as “ethics” and “care.”
The unblinding and elimination of the placebo group is done to obfuscate the harm being done by this ongoing medical experiment.
One cannot make the claim that something “works” (efficacy) or is safe if one doesn’t *actually* study it properly.
Despite that, there is ample evidence that it is neither. And yes, if you research the initial phases of these studies you will find that those were poorly done also (structured in such a way that they could not help but show a high degree of “efficacy”).
When one looks at absolute risk reduction (ARR) a far different picture emerges. The efficacy stands somewhere in the 0.8-1.3% range depending upon which jab.
Furthermore, there is literally *little to no risk* to children from the disease (a child is nearly twice as likely to be struck by lightning as to die from “covid”). We know there are risks to children specifically from the jab (myocarditis among them). There is also little evidence that these shots prevent transmission and much to support the idea that they do not.
Yet again, despite these facts, they are pushing jabs at younger and younger age groups sans any relevant safety profile.
Considering these facts together, I find this conclusion inescapable: the harm is intentional.
“Ethical requirement” my foot!
“the harm is intentional.” More of us are reaching this inescapable conclusion.
Bull. It has been done many times in the past on human subjects. I don’t know where you got your information from, but it is incorrect.
Really? Ivermectin has had 25 years of safe use. It has over 60 small studies for COVID with very good success and without the medication killing many like the vaccines have. Merck gave it away because it was cheap and safe and now says it isn’t safe. Really? Has Merck been lying for 25 years or just started lying when they see the opportunity to get filthy rich on taxpayer money. Previous vaccines have been stopped if they killed more than 25 people. These vaccines have killed thousands in the US alone. Why haven’t they been stopped?
“Dissolving the control group is an ‘ethical requirement’ when using human subjects. You cannot take human beings and say they cannot get the treatment that works.”
But you don’t know the treatment works — without a RCT.
You don’t KNOW that the treatment works better than another approach — or that it works without unacceptable (even massively fatal) AE’s down the line — or that reductions in hospitalization and death were due to the vaccine RATHER THAN due to a seasonal plunge in cases (which typically happens with all coronaviruses)) — if you’ve dissolved the control group.
Isn’t that the Catch-22?
People who join clinical trials, know that some of them are getting a placebo, right?
This is by no means a “gotcha” point. It’s a serious question.
The trial was supposedly a vaccine trial conducted on healthy people. It therefore must be assumed that the control group participants were not ill and the vaccine was not a treatment for anything.
Any honest ethical analysis must begin by recognizing that the control group consisted of the healthy.
The only conclusion to reach is that the destruction of a control group was done in order to prevent a valid study.
How many times over the past year and a half have we heard about the necessity for “randomized controlled” studies?
Bullcrap you can’t!! They do it in pretty much every single clinical drug study! I used to help run clinical trials & we even gave placebo to patients who were there for cancer, we had to bc it was required for the study. Nobody knows which one is placebo & which is the real study drug, including the patient & the person distributing the medicine. Nobody knows until the completion of the trial. If you happen to be one of the patients that got placebo, they’ll usually give you the real medication to use as well after the study is over.
When they say, “based on X test, it’s safe and protects…” that IS reason for mistrust. They are essentially committing fraud. There IS NO TEST if there’s no control group. Ending the control group EARLY to have just ONE set of data to cite is essentially “pick whatever result you want, and make the test match it”. It’s fraud and unethical.
Wrong. The “trial subjects are people” who are capable of making decisions to align with their own values. They made a decision to sign up for the study. Medical study participants voluntarily choose to enroll and understand risks and what placebos are. It is not wrong to let them go unvaccinated. They agreed to being to a potential control group. Am I not understanding this? It is more reprehensible to bury the data at a cost to the rest of the nation.
The “ethical requirement” is TRUTH, not obfuscation. The assumption that the control group is in any more danger has been dispelled by CDC stats on the survival rates from having Covid-19. The hysteria is being fomented by media hype and fear mongering.
” …and say they cannot get the treatment that works.”
So… the fact that the efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine has fallen to 42% is irrelevant?
the news media is the control group.
They were given “immunity” to prosecution….so what difference does it make now.
(Removing tongue from cheek….)
It’s supposed to make a difference when seeking FDA approval. The immunity is from legal liability (lawsuits), but prosecution for “willful misconduct” is supposedly on the table. But that type of charge would require seriously in-depth evidence or internal whistleblowers…something beyond what’s recounted in the 2000 film Erin Brockovich with Julia Roberts.
Probably the NPR article, as referred to in this one. The placebo subjects were not being treated for any symptoms or illness from Covid-19. It was strictly a vaccine placebo, and vaccines are preventative, so no malpractice would be indicated. Specialists who were trained to know better, chose to not adhere to proper scientific method – putting future recipients and patients at potential risk. Not to mention, the potential to adversely affect any FDA approval.
Because there probably never was a study. We’re it folks. Good luck.
I’ve read comments about possibly being forced to get some sort of shot before medical care. However, check your states “Patient Bill of Rights”. You have the right to refuse treatment. READ every consent form be it for surgery or not. Wherever it says “Biologics” that means blood AND vaccinations. I cross out and initial what I do not agree to. Then I write my own verbage and sign my name to it on the form. I advise you all do the same.
My living will is very specific as well in reference to my body and any procedures, to include shots.
THIS IS REALLY BEYOND NUTS
It invalidates the clinical trial and ability to approve the experimental gene therapies as safe and effective.
Medical malpractice and Criminal… All of it.
Just to be clear, the FDA authorized these “vaccines” on an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), so they are still considered experimental. In other words, the FDA “authorization” is still incomplete, the “vaccines” are NOT approved.
What were they smoking?
Anyone who believes in Big Pharma, CDC, or the FDA, needs to have their heads examined.
The pharm corps have managed to immunize themselves from any legal action due to vaccine side effects and death. But “losing” the control groups invalidates any studies claiming efficacy and safety of the so called vaccine. This does open a door to class action legal suits.
“This does open a door to class action legal suits.” Perhaps.
Someone has leaked copies of the agreements Pfizer signed with the various governments buying their vaccine. I can’t recall all of the details, but I would not be surprised if Pfizer included a boilerplate provision requiring indemnification by the purchaser, aka the government. If there is such a provision, I suppose an argument could be made that destroying the control group invalidates any indemnification clause. But I’m just guessing here.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted during a press briefing last week that her claim that over 99% of alleged COVID patients dying in the hospitals were “unvaccinated” was a lie.
What’s the magic number to declare genocide these days? One hundred thousand? A million?
I know of a fully vaccinated person that had his blood checked for spike protiens or ant-bodies. Results came back with neither!!! I believe that pharma may have sent out placebos disguised as vaccine. They can track who got what, where, when by lot and batch numbers from the vaccination databases. Maybe this is another reason for “breakthrough” cases. To include the vaccines suck! So, pharma will get their long term study done with unknowing test subjects.
this is beyond huge this this ludicrous and outrageous this to me makes big pharma a criminal organisation
Best control group for testing is our prisons. All eat the same thing and live the same lifestyle.
Or the military, right?
No to masks, no to “vaccine” No I will not comply and every American should say NO. Allthewhile they are beating on us to get the shot or else and hundreds of thousands are streaming across the border and being dumped into our communities. I guarantee if any honest journalist dug into this recent “spike” they would learn it is happening in the same place illegals are being dumped.
At a minimum Americans should say close the damn border and then talk to me about this.
Steve, we are being f-f-f, you know what I mean and it began a long, long time ago. As a nation we have no savior.
thank you
Probably never was a study. We’re it guys, best wishes
Thank you for sharing this eye-opening update!!
Thanks for sharing this update it is really surprising to see how these companies are intentionally doing this.
Thank you for sharing this update and bringing the information out in the light so that everyone can know about this. Keep doing the good work.